Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
It's normal, but I understand it may be undesired in the specific case of the "no location" filter. Usually it's useful to apply the filters of the current collection, so you see on the map only related and relevant media. Did you ask out of curiosity, or would it be useful to you to see other media when the "no location" filter is applied? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is it normal that when I use the "no location" filter and try to mark the photo using the map function, no photo is displayed?
But when I try without the filter, I can see the other photos according to their location.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions