-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hash to Point on G2 in BN256 pairing #416
Comments
Can you please explain further? You might have misunderstood the difference between the
So the hash to group element is |
Thanks for the clarification. I am referring to the definition of It also looks like |
Oups - I didn't read two lines down "not implemented" - sorry. You're right, @nikkolasg did the implementation of this code. Or perhaps @Daeinar can help here? Can we just copy/paste the code from |
We have created a pull request for hash to G2. The status can be found here: #428. |
Hello, thank you for your interest in kyber, with the existing attacks on BN curves, BN256 security dropped to around a 100bits and for this reason we won't be investing more effort into this curve. |
Hi,
First of all, thank you for your work on this crypto library.
Is there a reason Hash (to group element) is only defined for group G1, but not for G2?
I have a use case where key derivation requires hashing on both elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: