Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

Test data leakage issue #17

Closed
dschaehi opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Test data leakage issue #17

dschaehi opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@dschaehi
Copy link

dschaehi commented Feb 6, 2020

Hi, can you confirm the following claim in [1]?

KBAT incorporates ConvKB in the last layer of its model
architecture, which should be affected by different evaluation
protocols. But we find another bug on the leakage of test
triples during negative sampling in the reported model, which
results in more significant performance degradation.

[1] Z. Sun, S. Vashishth, S. Sanyal, P. Talukdar, Y. Yang, A Re-evaluation of Knowledge Graph Completion Methods, ArXiv:1911.03903 [Cs]. (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03903 (accessed November 14, 2019).

@hermangalio
Copy link

I would also be interested in this. Apparently the MRR score goes from .518 to .157 for the FB15k-237 dataset.

@LemonQC
Copy link

LemonQC commented Jul 9, 2020

Hi, can you confirm the following claim in [1]?

KBAT incorporates ConvKB in the last layer of its model
architecture, which should be affected by different evaluation
protocols. But we find another bug on the leakage of test
triples during negative sampling in the reported model, which
results in more significant performance degradation.

[1] Z. Sun, S. Vashishth, S. Sanyal, P. Talukdar, Y. Yang, A Re-evaluation of Knowledge Graph Completion Methods, ArXiv:1911.03903 [Cs]. (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03903 (accessed November 14, 2019).

But how to find the leak data in the source code. I have mailed to Sun, while I got no reply

@chauhanjatin10
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @dschaehi , @SakerLiu , @hgalioulline ,
Thanks for pointing the bug. You can follow the updates in issue #28 .
Thanks
Jatin

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants