You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is basically a note to remind me to look sometime at the BAM files produced by correctGCBias. Since it's not playing around with the flags, they should pass htsjdk's rather absurd validator as long as the input file does as well. However, this may not always be the case and it's actually quite simple to just munge the flags such that they're valid (or at least produce a little warning that the BAM file is valid, but IGV/Picard/GATK/etc. will possibly bork). Cf. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/deeptools/2gufhgs2YBQ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like correctGCBias is also adding invalid auxiliary tags (CO:f, GC:i) and misusing some legit ones (CP:i). This should be corrected at the same time.
This is basically a note to remind me to look sometime at the BAM files produced by correctGCBias. Since it's not playing around with the flags, they should pass htsjdk's rather absurd validator as long as the input file does as well. However, this may not always be the case and it's actually quite simple to just munge the flags such that they're valid (or at least produce a little warning that the BAM file is valid, but IGV/Picard/GATK/etc. will possibly bork). Cf. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/deeptools/2gufhgs2YBQ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: