Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate "single" TypeScript Configuration #12111

Closed
kitsonk opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Investigate "single" TypeScript Configuration #12111

kitsonk opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
breaking change a change or feature that breaks existing semantics feat new feature (which has been agreed to/accepted)

Comments

@kitsonk
Copy link
Contributor

kitsonk commented Sep 17, 2021

Based on the proposal in #7732, for Deno CLI 2.0 we want to investigate further what might be done in Deno 2.0 to reduce "variants" of TypeScript that would impact usability/consumability of code and try to figure out a way we can reduce or eliminate the need of people to configure TypeScript when using Deno.

This needs to be scoped and discussed further.
@kitsonk kitsonk added feat new feature (which has been agreed to/accepted) breaking change a change or feature that breaks existing semantics labels Sep 17, 2021
@kitsonk kitsonk added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Sep 17, 2021
@kitsonk kitsonk self-assigned this Sep 17, 2021
@kitsonk kitsonk mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2021
Closed
17 tasks
@bartlomieju bartlomieju removed this from the 2.0 milestone Mar 21, 2024
@jsejcksn jsejcksn mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2024
Closed
@bartlomieju bartlomieju reopened this Mar 21, 2024
@bartlomieju bartlomieju closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
breaking change a change or feature that breaks existing semantics feat new feature (which has been agreed to/accepted)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kitsonk @bartlomieju