-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependabot PR titles suddenly less specific: across 1 directory
rather than in /website
#9639
Comments
Ah I see, this is a duplicate of #9631 |
Reopening as this is a more negative impact version of #9361 given there is a loss of information here rather than just useless extra information. |
I tried to identify the root cause of this bug this morning. Some initial notes: Unit test coverage is here: dependabot-core/common/spec/dependabot/pull_request_creator/message_builder_spec.rb Lines 965 to 983 in db38e85
Which appears intended to cover this method: dependabot-core/common/lib/dependabot/pull_request_creator/message_builder.rb Lines 256 to 273 in db38e85
|
The branch name is also incorrect/sub-optimal:
I am guessing it would ideally be: If only one directory included in the update across the group:
If more than one directory included in the update across the group:
|
Is there an existing issue for this?
What you expected to see, versus what you actually saw
It appears that around 18 hours ago (2024-04-29 20:00 UTC) grouped dependabot PR titles became more generic, less specific as follows:
Old:
chore(deps): bump the minorandpatch group in /website with 16 updates
New:
chore(deps): bump the minorandpatch group across 1 directory with 16 updates
Note: the specific and informative
in /website
got replaced with the genericacross 1 directory
making it much harder to tell at a glance what's impacted.I noticed this change in a private repo, but I also found evidence for it in dependabot's own repo, see screenshots (coinciding with the timing I noticed above, indicating this is a global behavior change):
Old:
New:
This might be intended behavior, if so, I would like to strongly urge to reconsider.
Images of the diff or a link to the PR, issue, or logs
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: