You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Too many times I've watched people highlight (2,3) and type ( expecting to get blank parens and instead getting ((2,3)).
Because it's so easy to open and close parens, it doesn't feel like highlight & type should wrap (like we do with square roots and fractions).
Final proposed designs:
If the highlighted content is wrapped in parentheses and you type the same kind of parentheses, it erases the content and you're left with empty (and hardened) parentheses instead of double-paren-wrapping the contents.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Too many times I've watched people highlight (2,3) and type
(
expecting to get blank parens and instead getting((2,3))
.Because it's so easy to open and close parens, it doesn't feel like highlight & type should wrap (like we do with square roots and fractions).
Final proposed designs:
If the highlighted content is wrapped in parentheses and you type the same kind of parentheses, it erases the content and you're left with empty (and hardened) parentheses instead of double-paren-wrapping the contents.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: