-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature request] Add proxy setting #115
Comments
Personally, I don't think this is within the scope of the application and any proxy settings should probably be system-wide. What do you think, @rafaelmardojai ? |
@fushinari However, the final decision is up to the developer(s). |
Actually, I think I agree with you that it's a good addition. But it adds a layer of complexity that I'm not sure I want. Also, to implement it properly, we would need |
@fushinari |
I agree with this. And would also add, as a suggestion, the user IP to be somehow replaced by another IP who would then be the one presenting directly the translation request to Google Translator. This would further justify the Dialect usage over the Google Translator website through the browser. I do not know the feasibility of this but it would be great... thanks! |
No need for that, we are in Linux :) For Tor:You can just use the For other proxies:You can use environment variables, for example: export http_proxy=socks5://127.0.0.1:9050
export https_proxy=$http_proxy Or to directly start dialect with them: http_proxy=socks5://127.0.0.1:9050 https_proxy=$http_proxy dialect
Read this for more info: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Proxy_server#Environment_variables You might be able to also use a sandboxing tool to apply a proxy, but I didn't test it. |
Just for the record, Dialect doesn't use |
Oh So After some search it should work with |
Only Google text-to-speech (gTTS), Google translation is implemented with libsoup.
Yeah, the env vars you pointed should work with libsoup. |
Hi.
This may be strange request from title ! But it's usefulness is that:
If this feature accepted to be added as future enhancement, then it should allow SOCKS 5 proxy & should allow user to select UDP or TCP or automatic(UDP/TCP) protocol.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: