-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create or extend functional roles for virtual machines #1493
Comments
Does it make sense to use the same set of roles for VMs as for devices though? You wouldn't assign a VM the role of PDU, NAS, console server, etc. We could either create a separate set of roles only for VMs, or we could extend the existing role model to include a boolean field indicating whether it's applicable for VMs. |
I like the boolean option on the existing model and I think it should also be extended to the platform model as the same argument could be made there. |
At least a NAS could very well be a VM (some hyperconverged solutions use VMs to serve CIFS/NFS to the outside world, and there are clustered and virtualized storage systems that provide multi-tenant capable isolated virtual NAS/SAN instances) |
Implemented the base relationship in 6243fbf. Will experiment with adding per-model flags to the DeviceRole model shortly. |
…ting applicability to virtual machines
Issue type
[X] Feature request
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Documentation
Environment
Description
I would like Virtual Machines to have a "Role", just like Devices. They can be taken from the same set of Device Roles.
Use case:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: