Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for module/part manufacturers #157

Closed
ryanmerolle opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Allow for module/part manufacturers #157

ryanmerolle opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@ryanmerolle
Copy link
Contributor

Examples where module/parts manufacturer are different from the chassis:

  • Optics/twinax/DAC in NICs
  • Server NICs (SolarFlare, Intel, etc.)
@puck
Copy link

puck commented Jul 1, 2016

Also, modules and parts can add more ports.

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Modules were originally intended to store information gleaned through automated inventory, e.g. show inventory (Cisco IOS) or show chassis hardware (Junos). AFAIK it's not possible to determine a vendor this way, so that wasn't added as a field.

I think it makes sense to add an optional manufacturer field to the Module model. Should this be tied to the Manufacturer model (as DeviceTypes are) or a freeform text field?

@ryanmerolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would tie it to manufacturer model. Free form allows for mistakes. From an inventory / search I'd want to be able to find out how many of a x model in an environment when it comes to recalls or upgrades.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application and removed new feature labels Jul 5, 2016
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added roadmap and removed type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Jul 20, 2016
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added this to the v1.5 milestone Jul 20, 2016
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants