Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rack Elevation links in Site view #2225

Closed
lowpolyfire opened this issue Jul 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Rack Elevation links in Site view #2225

lowpolyfire opened this issue Jul 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@lowpolyfire
Copy link

Issue type

[X] Feature request
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Documentation
[ ] Housekeeping

Environment

  • Python version: 3.5.2
  • NetBox version: 2.3.5

Description

When looking at a Site from the Site object view, there are statistics and a list of Rack Groups. You can click on the Rack Group name to show the Racks in that Rack Group. Unfortunately, to show the Elevation of those Rack Group you are required to navigate to the Elevations tab and filter or navigate to the Rack Groups and click on Show Elevation link. It would save at least three clicks and help with the page flow.

It could look like this image below:
rack_elevation_site_view
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Jul 18, 2018
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2018
Merged
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lowpolyfire @jeremystretch