You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So it looks like the normal convention for button placement in panels is in the panel-footer in Netbox. For most areas this isn't a big deal, but the 'Interfaces' panel for Devices gets rather lengthy for some larger chassis based switches. It seems to be a fairly established UI convention to have buttons placed at the top of the resource they control.
Here is an example of what I am thinking:
Now I don't have to scroll to the bottom of the page to make additions or delete selected interfaces. This also might be a good place for a "Select All" checkbox as well.
I wouldn't mind making this change, but wanted your(stretch) opinion first
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I feel the buttons would rather be placed on the right side. 'Add interface' right to 'delete interface' button and the padding between those should be fixed too.
The "add <object>" buttons are now displayed in the bottom right corner of all device and device type component panels. The are also displayed in the top right corner if the panel contains more than ten objects.
So it looks like the normal convention for button placement in panels is in the panel-footer in Netbox. For most areas this isn't a big deal, but the 'Interfaces' panel for Devices gets rather lengthy for some larger chassis based switches. It seems to be a fairly established UI convention to have buttons placed at the top of the resource they control.
Here is an example of what I am thinking:
Now I don't have to scroll to the bottom of the page to make additions or delete selected interfaces. This also might be a good place for a "Select All" checkbox as well.
I wouldn't mind making this change, but wanted your(stretch) opinion first
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: