Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ability to filter for unnamed devices #893

Closed
Armadill0 opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Ability to filter for unnamed devices #893

Armadill0 opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@Armadill0
Copy link

Currently devices which have no name specified can only be found fast by sorting them by name in inverted order. This is ok if there are only a few systems without a name. If their number increases this is getting quite cumbersome.

To enhance this it would be handy if we could get a filter switch to filter for unnamed devices.
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Feb 13, 2017
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Added NullableCharFieldFilter for rack facility IDs, device names and asset tags, and inventory item asset tags. This allows us to filter by, for example, /api/dcim/devices/?name=NULL to return only unnamed devices.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2017
Merged
lampwins pushed a commit to lampwins/netbox that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
@jeremystretch
Closes netbox-community#893: Allow filtering by null values for NullC…
d51712c 
…haracterFields (e.g. return only unnamed devices)
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Armadill0 @jeremystretch