We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chapter "Assemblies", section "Relationships" contains a description about the relationship(s) structure.
The section shows this example:
<relationship type="seealso"> <instance linkend="tut1"/> <instance linkend="tut2"/> <instance linkend="task1"/> </relationship>
However, this example is a bit misleading as it seems to be incomplete. The section and the example has the following issues:
<relationships>
<relationship>
<association>
IMHO, we should amend this example like this:
<relationships> <relationship type="seealso"> <association>???</association> <instance linkend="tut1"/> <instance linkend="tut2"/> <instance linkend="task1"/> </relationship> </relationship>
Not sure what we should put inside the <association> element.
docbook/docbook#214
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Problem
Chapter "Assemblies", section "Relationships" contains a description about the relationship(s) structure.
The section shows this example:
However, this example is a bit misleading as it seems to be incomplete. The section and the example has the following issues:
<relationships>
(plural!) element<relationships>
(plural) and<relationship>
(singular)<association>
element as it required in DocBook 5.2*Possible solution
IMHO, we should amend this example like this:
Not sure what we should put inside the
<association>
element.Related issue
docbook/docbook#214
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: