Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

s390x architecture (IBM-Z) out of support? #408

Closed
sebsgr opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

s390x architecture (IBM-Z) out of support? #408

sebsgr opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
question Usability question, not directly related to an error with the image Request Request for image modification or feature

Comments

@sebsgr
Copy link

sebsgr commented Apr 30, 2020

For s390x architecture (IBM-Z) the latest image version is 11.0.3-jre-slim-stretch.

Are there any plans to build latest versions for this architecture?
@sebsgr sebsgr changed the title s390x (IBM-Z) out of support? s390x architecture (IBM-Z) out of support? Apr 30, 2020
@wglambert wglambert added question Usability question, not directly related to an error with the image Request Request for image modification or feature labels Apr 30, 2020
@wglambert
Copy link

A lot of architectures were lost when shifting to AdoptOpenJDK as the binary source docker-library/official-images#5953

-arm32v5, arm32v7, i386, ppc64le, s390x

Full discussion on the change #322 (comment)

I know IBM has been keen on ppc64le and s390x in the past, but they're shifting their focus almost entirely to AdoptOpenJDK (as I've understood), so those likely aren't going to be a very heavy loss here (as much as I personally enjoy them 😄).

@sebsgr sebsgr closed this as completed May 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Usability question, not directly related to an error with the image Request Request for image modification or feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sebsgr @wglambert