-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[1.12.x] Move StreamConfig
out of runconfig
#29370
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`StreamConfig` carries with it a dep on libcontainerd, which is used by other projects, but libcontainerd doesn't compile on all platforms, so move it to `github.com/docker/docker/container/stream` Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
LGTM |
justincormack
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2016
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2016
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2016
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
yongtang
added a commit
to yongtang/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
aaronlehmann
pushed a commit
to moby/swarmkit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2017
This fix tries to address the issue raised in moby/moby#29370 where a service with multiple published ports mapping to the same target port (e.g., `--publish 5000:80 --publish 5001:80`) can't be allocated. The reason for the issue is that, `getPortConfigKey` is used for both allocated ports and configured (may or may not be allocated) ports. However, `getPortConfigKey` will not take into consideration the `PublishedPort` field, which actually could be different for different allocated ports. This fix saves a map of `portKey:portNum:portState`, instead of currently used `portKey:portState` so that multiple published ports could be processed. A test case has been added in the unit test. The newly added test case will only work with this PR. Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com> (cherry picked from commit 5fe66da)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
StreamConfig
carries with it a dep on libcontainerd, which is used byother projects, but libcontainerd doesn't compile on all platforms, so
move it to
github.com/docker/docker/container/stream