We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug
Singularity is now Apptainer and we reference Singularity in our docs.
To Reproduce
https://docs.dockstore.org/en/develop/advanced-topics/docker-alternatives.html
Expected behavior
s/Singularity/Apptainer
Screenshots If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
https://apptainer.org/news/community-announcement-20211130/
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story ┆Issue Number: DOCK-2588 ┆Sprint: Backlog ┆Issue Type: Story
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this is a bit of a Spiderman situation.
Sylabs still ships "SingularityCE" as something they call singularity, and SingularityCE and Apptainer are both active projects which are adding new diverged features and behavior.
singularity
Sorry, something went wrong.
Just curious, what is a Spiderman situation? :) I couldn't find anything with a quick Google search.
These guys:
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Singularity is now Apptainer and we reference Singularity in our docs.
To Reproduce
https://docs.dockstore.org/en/develop/advanced-topics/docker-alternatives.html
Expected behavior
s/Singularity/Apptainer
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
https://apptainer.org/news/community-announcement-20211130/
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Story
┆Issue Number: DOCK-2588
┆Sprint: Backlog
┆Issue Type: Story
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: