Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Widgets README #19

Closed
agubler opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Widgets README #19

agubler opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@agubler
Copy link
Member

agubler commented Feb 6, 2017

Enhancement

Now we are starting to get a few completed components, we should think about the Widgets README in terms of the details and structure needed.

@agubler agubler added this to the 2017.02 milestone Feb 6, 2017
@dylans dylans modified the milestones: 2017.02, 2017.03 Mar 1, 2017
@rishson rishson self-assigned this Mar 14, 2017
@rishson
Copy link
Contributor

rishson commented Mar 21, 2017

I think we are OK with the README for beta 1, but for beta 2, we need to include:

  • code examples of using the uber package
  • Link to a gallery page that shows all the widgets written so far, what they look like etc

@agubler anything missing from the list?

@bitpshr
Copy link
Member

bitpshr commented Mar 26, 2017

It may also be good to demonstrate extending one of our components.

@dylans dylans modified the milestones: 2017.03, 2017.04 Apr 2, 2017
@rishson
Copy link
Contributor

rishson commented Apr 5, 2017

Maybe we should also explain the naming conventions that we use within widgets, such as onRequestX for externally handled changes.

@rishson
Copy link
Contributor

rishson commented Apr 11, 2017

  • code examples of using the uber package
  • individual widget READMEs with link on main page
  • document event handler naming conventions
  • document extending a widget

@dylans dylans modified the milestones: 2017.04, 2017.05 Apr 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants