Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split Host and Deploy RC/Blazor content #11714

Closed
guardrex opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 — with docs.microsoft.com · 2 comments
Closed

Split Host and Deploy RC/Blazor content #11714

guardrex opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 — with docs.microsoft.com · 2 comments

Comments

Copy link
Collaborator

guardrex commented Mar 27, 2019

@tdykstra We need to split the RC and Blazor Host and deploy content.

Two possible approaches leap to mind ...

1

An overview for each hosting model can hold the common content using an INCLUDE. The Overview topics can then cover each hosting model.

[EDIT] NOT USING 👇 👎

Host and deploy (*host-and-deploy* folder)
    ... other nodes ...

    Blazor node (*blazor* folder)
        Overview (*index.md*) - INCLUDE for common content followed by Blazor-specific content.
        Configure the Linker topic (*configure-linker.md*)
        
    Razor components node (*razor-components* folder)
        Overview (*index.md*) - INCLUDE for common content followed by RC-specific content.

    ... host and deploy topics ...

[EDIT] WILL USE 👇 👍

2

Here's an alternative that uses a common node (Razor Components/Blazor) ...

Host and deploy (*host-and-deploy* folder)
    ... other nodes ...

    Razor Components/Blazor node (*razor-components-blazor* folder)
        Overview (*index.md*) - Contains the common content.
        Blazor (*blazor.md*) - Blazor-specific host and deploy content.
            Configure the Linker topic (*configure-linker.md*)
        Razor Components (*razor-components.md*) - RC-specific host and deploy content.

    ... host and deploy topics ...

Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added the Source - Docs.ms Docs Customer feedback via GitHub Issue label Mar 27, 2019
@guardrex guardrex self-assigned this Mar 27, 2019
@guardrex guardrex added Pri1 Razor Components and removed Source - Docs.ms Docs Customer feedback via GitHub Issue labels Mar 27, 2019
@guardrex guardrex added this to the 2019 Q1 ends March 31 milestone Mar 27, 2019
@tdykstra
Copy link
Contributor

@guardrex I'm not familiar enough with the documentation to make a strong recommendation either way. I incline toward #2 but if you prefer #1, I'd say try it and see how it works.

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I agree. When linking to this content in a general way ('For more info, see ...') ...

Let's go with #2. Looks a lot better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants