Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Azure Dev Ops][armel] Enable armel/Tizen jobs in Azure Dev Ops #11625

Closed
jashook opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

[Azure Dev Ops][armel] Enable armel/Tizen jobs in Azure Dev Ops #11625

jashook opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
arch-arm32 area-Infrastructure-coreclr backlog-cleanup-candidate An inactive issue that has been marked for automated closure. no-recent-activity
Milestone

Comments

@jashook
Copy link
Contributor

jashook commented Dec 6, 2018

Change the tizen(armel) jobs to run using helix. This will unblock moving the armel jobs from netci to azure dev ops. Currently there are several things that blocking this effort, see the summary below.

  1. A reproducible dockerfile to create the tizen image we use in netci checked into https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet-buildtools-prereqs-docker.
  2. Arm32 hardware (either raspberry pi or jetson tx2) in the lab in its own helix queue, which can run docker.

The proposed testing plan is:

  1. docker run -i --rm -v coreclr:/coreclr -w /coreclr -e ROOTFS_DIR=/crossrootfs/armel microsoft/dotnet-buildtools-prereqs:ubuntu-16.04-cross-armel ./build.sh armel cross checked

  2. docker run -i --rm -v coreclr:/coreclr -w /coreclr -e ROOTFS_DIR=/crossrootfs/armel microsoft/dotnet-buildtools-prereqs:ubuntu-16.04-cross-armel ./build-test.sh armel checked

  3. helixpublishwitharcade.proj


Helix nodes will run on arm64/armhf hardware, connected under the tizen docker image. Once helix supports running under docker, we can change this to point at the new tizen image.

@jashook
Copy link
Contributor Author

jashook commented Dec 6, 2018

/cc @RussKeldorph @sbomer @safern

@jashook
Copy link
Contributor Author

jashook commented Dec 6, 2018

/cc @BruceForstall

@jashook
Copy link
Contributor Author

jashook commented Dec 6, 2018

/cc @dotnet/arm32-contrib

@alpencolt
Copy link

cc @gbalykov

@msftgits msftgits transferred this issue from dotnet/coreclr Jan 31, 2020
@msftgits msftgits added this to the Future milestone Jan 31, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 30, 2023

Due to lack of recent activity, this issue has been marked as a candidate for backlog cleanup. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 14 more days. Any new comment (by anyone, not necessarily the author) will undo this process.

This process is part of our issue cleanup automation.

@ghost ghost added backlog-cleanup-candidate An inactive issue that has been marked for automated closure. no-recent-activity labels Aug 30, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 13, 2023

This issue will now be closed since it had been marked no-recent-activity but received no further activity in the past 14 days. It is still possible to reopen or comment on the issue, but please note that the issue will be locked if it remains inactive for another 30 days.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Sep 13, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 13, 2023
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
arch-arm32 area-Infrastructure-coreclr backlog-cleanup-candidate An inactive issue that has been marked for automated closure. no-recent-activity
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants