Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows cpuSet for load and app jobs is not observed #575

Open
RobertHenry6bev opened this issue Apr 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Windows cpuSet for load and app jobs is not observed #575

RobertHenry6bev opened this issue Apr 19, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@RobertHenry6bev
Copy link
Contributor

I want to run crank teche dotnet PlatformBenchmarks app and the bombardier loadgen on an 80 core ARM64 Windows 11 Enterprise Insider Preview machine,

The configuration yaml file has cpuSet at these places in the spec:

rofiles:
  some-name:
    jobs:
      application:
        cpuSet: 54-63
      load:
        cpuSet: 0-9

Running ProcessExplorer when the workload runs shows that cpus 0-15 have work, and cpus 64-79 have work. That's not what my cpuSet asked for. Further, ProcessE:xplorer says that both the app PlatformBenchmarks and Bombardier regularly run on cpus in both of those sets, eg on cpus 0-15 and also on 64-79.

I do not know if the same behavior is observed on AMD64 hosts.

I hope that ProcessExplorer is doing the right thing.

I wonder if NUMA scheduling is also playing a hand in this? it shouldn't, since on this platform (Ampere Mt. Snow) there's only 1 socket.

ScreenShot-80core-ARM-not-pinned

@RobertHenry6bev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure I believe what ProcessExplorer and "System Information" tell me. I believe TaskManager more, in that it shows cores running with 100% load, and those cores are exactly the ones I'd pinned my app PlatformBenchmarks to

@RobertHenry6bev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Independent experiments on other Windows machines leads me to believe that ProcessExplorer is broken,, in that data for one CPU is displayed identically in 2 distinct boxes offset in some regular (TBD) way.

@RobertHenry6bev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant