Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document shared framework #5009

Closed
Rick-Anderson opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Document shared framework #5009

Rick-Anderson opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] Pri3 won't fix Issues that were closed as part of automated backlog grooming
Milestone

Comments

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor

Rick-Anderson commented Apr 24, 2018

Update 9-18-19:

  • Find the right place in this repo for the shared framework doc.
  • Ask @natemcmaster to copy paste his blog here. I'll do the conversion.

Update - Deep-dive into .NET Core primitives, part 2: the shared framework looks like it has all the info we need.

The following reference the Microsoft.NETCore.App "shared framework", but it's never defined:

.NET Core distribution packaging comes close, but that's the wrong place to explain the shared framework.

The following pages should be updated to use "shared framework" or at least consistent terminology.

dotnet --info lists .NET Core runtimes installed:

Microsoft.AspNetCore.All 2.1.3 [/usr/local/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.All]
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 2.1.3 [/usr/local/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
Microsoft.NETCore.App 2.1.3 [/usr/local/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App]

.NET Core application deployment (FDD) relies on the presence of a shared system-wide version of .NET Core on the target system.
Is that the shared framework?

Packages, metapackages and frameworks states:
Another set is new frameworks that can be thought of as "package-based frameworks", which establish a new model for defining frameworks. These package-based frameworks are entirely formed and defined as packages, forming a strong relationship between packages and frameworks.

How does that fit in? What is a package-based framework?

@mairaw
Copy link
Contributor

mairaw commented Apr 30, 2018

Thanks @Rick-Anderson. @KathleenDollard can you help with this one? Do you see a good place to put such information?

@mairaw mairaw added P1 labels Apr 30, 2018
@mairaw mairaw self-assigned this Apr 30, 2018
@KathleenDollard
Copy link
Contributor

@terrajobst

@terrajobst
Copy link
Member

@richlander would know the details better

@BillWagner BillWagner added this to the 2018 - Quarter 2 milestone May 21, 2018
@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would:

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll bet @JRAlexander could knock this out in a couple hours.

@mairaw
Copy link
Contributor

mairaw commented Jun 19, 2018

@Rick-Anderson can you help? 😄

@mairaw mairaw modified the milestones: 2018 - Quarter 2, 2018 - Quarter 3 Jun 19, 2018
@KathleenDollard
Copy link
Contributor

Eeek. It looks like we are using "shared framework" and "framework dependent" pretty much as synonyms. Which is pretty confusing.

@richlander can you weigh in on this (check the use of the two phrases in dotnet command page link above)

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@KathleenDollard @richlander can we get this scheduled?

@mairaw mairaw modified the milestones: 2018 - Quarter 3, 2018 - Quarter 4 Sep 24, 2018
@BillWagner BillWagner modified the milestones: 2018 - Quarter 4, Backlog Feb 25, 2019
@tdykstra tdykstra added the doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] label Nov 13, 2019
@dotnet-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been closed as part of the issue backlog grooming process outlined in #22351.

That automated process may have closed some issues that should be addressed. If you think this is one of them, reopen it with a comment explaining why. Tag the @dotnet/docs team for visibility.

@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added the won't fix Issues that were closed as part of automated backlog grooming label Jan 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] Pri3 won't fix Issues that were closed as part of automated backlog grooming
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants