-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document shared framework #5009
Comments
Thanks @Rick-Anderson. @KathleenDollard can you help with this one? Do you see a good place to put such information? |
@richlander would know the details better |
I would:
|
I'll bet @JRAlexander could knock this out in a couple hours. |
@Rick-Anderson can you help? 😄 |
Eeek. It looks like we are using "shared framework" and "framework dependent" pretty much as synonyms. Which is pretty confusing. @richlander can you weigh in on this (check the use of the two phrases in dotnet command page link above) |
@KathleenDollard @richlander can we get this scheduled? |
This issue has been closed as part of the issue backlog grooming process outlined in #22351. That automated process may have closed some issues that should be addressed. If you think this is one of them, reopen it with a comment explaining why. Tag the |
Update 9-18-19:
@natemcmaster
to copy paste his blog here. I'll do the conversion.Update - Deep-dive into .NET Core primitives, part 2: the shared framework looks like it has all the info we need.
The following reference the
Microsoft.NETCore.App
"shared framework", but it's never defined:ASP.NET Core Shared Framework
, Benefits of a shared framework, Version "train" locking, publishing.NET Core distribution packaging comes close, but that's the wrong place to explain the shared framework.
The following pages should be updated to use "shared framework" or at least consistent terminology.
dotnet --info
lists .NET Core runtimes installed:.NET Core application deployment (FDD) relies on the presence of a shared system-wide version of .NET Core on the target system.
Is that the shared framework?
Packages, metapackages and frameworks states:
Another set is new frameworks that can be thought of as "package-based frameworks", which establish a new model for defining frameworks. These package-based frameworks are entirely formed and defined as packages, forming a strong relationship between packages and frameworks.
How does that fit in? What is a package-based framework?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: