You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue tracks progress and discussion for moving the dotnet/linker repo into dotnet/runtime repo.
Progress
Selected the location of the repository as runtime\src\tools\linker
Ability to transfer Linker history to runtime using the consolidation script
Add cecil as an arcade package in order to avoid having a submodule
Rename package to DotNet.Cecil
Be able to run dotnet format to apply runtime formatting to linker repo
Create subsets (tools.linker & tools.linkertests) in order to be able to run and test the repo
Run in CI
Rename linker to illink
Add additional label
Build a package from the new location or use live bits
Motivation
Code Sharing. At this moment NativeAOT and linker share a lot of code via a straight copy. NativeAOT consumes the ILLink.Shared project which is a shared project between linker, trimming analyzer and NativeAOT. It also shares the same testing infrastructure and even shares additional files that are not included in the shared project since they are only shared between linker and NativeAOT (not for the trimming analyzer). The plan is that once we move the linker repository to runtime we can take advantage of having only one ILLink.Shared project, only one testing infrastructure, and we can improve code sharing between linker and NativeAOT, even having the same formats and analyzers applied to the codebases improve the current state of code sharing.
So far there have some locations that seem relevant
src\coreclr\tools\ folder, although it would be closer to the AOT tools linker is not strictly a part of the coreclr
Create a new folder under src\tools for tools that are agnostic to the clr. Likely the best option.
Maybe somewhere in the mono partition?
Avoiding having a cecil submodule
Part of the linker workflow is to have a .gitmodules file that specifies a mono/cecil module, for runtime this won't fit the runtime needs. So we need to maybe ship cecil packages from mono/cecil and consume them in the runtime to later be used by linker
Linker style of code format
Currently, linker repo uses mono style of code. This makes already codesharing with NativeAOT more difficult since we cannot share code as is. Linker already transition from the mono space to the dotnet space, which leaves in the air if it should still use the mono guidelines. Once moving to the runtime repo and giving that we want to share code, the most likely solution is to just use runtime format for that repo. Note: mono directories under runtime still use the mono style of code guidelines.
Legs for execution
Need a definition on when should ci build linker and run linker tests. Most likely will remain as a subset just like currently clr.tools and clr.toolstests, and run only if changes in the linker repo are made. For source build, building and testing the linker repo seems inevitable unless we create a different leg that only runs linker.
Add an additional label
Add an additional label to runtime to identify linker issues
Keep a history of the linker changes
There are some scripts that were used to consolidate different repositories into runtime, although they are tailored to work with certain repositories we could configure it to keep the history from linker (see https://github.com/dotnet/consolidation)
Migration of github issues
Previous runtime consolidation work had the help of GitHub to migrate all issues from the different repos to the new dotnet/runtime repo, and then lock down creation of additional issues, such that the repos will no longer be used for issue management. They also inhibit the creation of PRs to the main branch, effectively making old repos an archive for read-only review of history. Plan is to do the same for linker
Move linker repo to runtime repo
This issue tracks progress and discussion for moving the dotnet/linker repo into dotnet/runtime repo.
Progress
Motivation
Select the location for the linker project
So far there have some locations that seem relevant
src\coreclr\tools\
folder, although it would be closer to the AOT tools linker is not strictly a part of the coreclrsrc\tools
for tools that are agnostic to the clr. Likely the best option.Avoiding having a cecil submodule
Part of the linker workflow is to have a
.gitmodules
file that specifies amono/cecil
module, for runtime this won't fit the runtime needs. So we need to maybe ship cecil packages from mono/cecil and consume them in the runtime to later be used by linkerLinker style of code format
Currently, linker repo uses mono style of code. This makes already codesharing with NativeAOT more difficult since we cannot share code as is. Linker already transition from the mono space to the dotnet space, which leaves in the air if it should still use the mono guidelines. Once moving to the runtime repo and giving that we want to share code, the most likely solution is to just use runtime format for that repo. Note: mono directories under runtime still use the mono style of code guidelines.
Legs for execution
Need a definition on when should ci build linker and run linker tests. Most likely will remain as a subset just like currently clr.tools and clr.toolstests, and run only if changes in the linker repo are made. For source build, building and testing the linker repo seems inevitable unless we create a different leg that only runs linker.
Add an additional label
Add an additional label to runtime to identify linker issues
Keep a history of the linker changes
There are some scripts that were used to consolidate different repositories into runtime, although they are tailored to work with certain repositories we could configure it to keep the history from linker (see https://github.com/dotnet/consolidation)
Migration of github issues
Previous runtime consolidation work had the help of GitHub to migrate all issues from the different repos to the new dotnet/runtime repo, and then lock down creation of additional issues, such that the repos will no longer be used for issue management. They also inhibit the creation of PRs to the main branch, effectively making old repos an archive for read-only review of history. Plan is to do the same for linker
Copy of dotnet/runtime#75278
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: