Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated the SDK 7.0.304 version, but the bug won't go away. #8852

Closed
cyberprophet opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 12 comments
Closed

updated the SDK 7.0.304 version, but the bug won't go away. #8852

cyberprophet opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@cyberprophet
Copy link

The bugs I had in SDK 7.0.302 still seem to exist.

#8718 (comment)

@ghost ghost added the untriaged label Jun 21, 2023
@Luk164
Copy link

Luk164 commented Jun 23, 2023

Same, I am running on sdk 7.0.304 and also tried out 7.0.400-preview.23274.1 and the bug is still there, though the components seem to render this time around. This occurs on both VS 17.6.4 and 17.7.0 Preview 2

@cyberprophet
Copy link
Author

The solution is the only thing I can do is force down the sdk version using global.json.

@phil-allen-msft phil-allen-msft added the area-compiler Umbrella for all compiler issues label Jun 23, 2023
@chsienki
Copy link
Contributor

chsienki commented Jul 3, 2023

Can you confirm exactly which SDK + Visual Studio versions you are using? Thanks

@chsienki chsienki self-assigned this Jul 3, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the untriaged label Jul 3, 2023
@chsienki chsienki added this to the 17.8 Planning milestone Jul 3, 2023
@Luk164
Copy link

Luk164 commented Jul 5, 2023

@chsienki 7.0.304 + VS 17.6.4 for me. Also 7.0.400-preview.23274.1 and 17.7.0 Preview 2

@ghost ghost added the no recent activity label Jul 12, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 12, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 7 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days of this comment. If it is closed, feel free to comment when you are able to provide the additional information and we will re-investigate.

Please see our Issue Management Policies for more information.

@Luk164
Copy link

Luk164 commented Jul 12, 2023

Please don't close this, the issue is very annoying because I have to keep an instance of 17.5.4 installed to work with blazor projects.

@jaredpar
Copy link
Member

Do you have a repro project that we can look at?

@Luk164
Copy link

Luk164 commented Jul 13, 2023

@jaredpar Here you go, though realistically all you need is a fresh blazor repo and add this:

@typeparam T where T : new()

<h3>LookAtMe</h3>

@code {

}

@davidwengier
Copy link
Contributor

@Luk164 Could you confirm exactly which bug you're hitting? You mentioned above that "the components seem to render this time around" which makes me think that you are hitting a different bug than the comment linked above. This seems to be backed up by your repro file, which has no components.

Is it possible you're hitting #8572 instead?

@Luk164
Copy link

Luk164 commented Jul 13, 2023

@davidwengier RZ1017 I believe, so #8572 could be a match, but I am not sure. And yes it does indeed compile. I am currently stuck using VS17.5.4 as it is the last version I know of without the bug.

@davidwengier
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for confirming. That was fixed last week, so sadly there will be a little bit of a wait before its available in a VS release. Should be in the first preview of the next minor version of VS though.

The issue should fix itself when there is a project change of any kind, including just adding whitespace to the project file, but I understand that's not the most fun way to live :)

@jaredpar
Copy link
Member

Closing as a dupe of #8572

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants