Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalize JIT usages of array length calcuation #103908

Open
tannergooding opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Normalize JIT usages of array length calcuation #103908

tannergooding opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Milestone

Comments

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

As per #103778 (comment), there are a few places in the JIT that are using ARRAY_SIZE but the use of ArrLen is preferred where possible.

We should ideally normalize these to be consistent in the JIT and consider whether this is something we want to make more consistent across the codebase as well.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 24, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jun 24, 2024
@tannergooding tannergooding added this to the Future milestone Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jun 24, 2024
@tannergooding
Copy link
Member Author

Marked this future as it's low priority consistency cleanup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant