Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFE: Add support for using system version of the llvm-libunwind library #104796

Open
omajid opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

RFE: Add support for using system version of the llvm-libunwind library #104796

omajid opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@omajid
Copy link
Member

omajid commented Jul 12, 2024

The .NET runtime has a copy of the llvm-libunwind library at src/native/external. Like other libraries in runtime (eg, rapidjson, zlib, libunwind), it would be nice if we could build runtime against the system version of the llvm-libunwind library instead.

I gave it a quick try and it looks like the runtime uses several internal APIs from llvm-libunwind, which makes it hard to link against just the public API provided by the system llvm-libunwind library.

This isn't an urgent/important issue. I certainly don't want/expect it to be fixed for .NET 9. I am filing it here so this stays tracked.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jul 12, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 12, 2024
@jkotas
Copy link
Member

jkotas commented Jul 12, 2024

Related #72655

@jkotas jkotas removed untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jul 12, 2024
@jkotas jkotas added this to the Future milestone Jul 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants