You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks. I didn't consider the architecture specific differences between the implementations. Perhaps the documentation can be improved once ShuffleNative lands to underline the differences.
Description
Calling
Vector128.Shuffle
orVector256.Shuffle
produces different code than callingShuffle
directly on the intrinsic.Reproduction Steps
Expected behavior
Expected for
VectorN
to produce identical output as the direct intrinsics calls:Actual behavior
Regression?
No response
Known Workarounds
Use the hardware intrinsic class instead of generic Vector
Configuration
Other information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: