We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HashSet is likely prone to the same expensive hang as it uses essentially the same datastructures.
We should port dotnet/coreclr#16991 to Hashset.
cc @benaadams
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/28123
Sorry, something went wrong.
I see @vancem pointed out it has been reported to have been hit in cloud services using HashSet also. We should certainly port, then.
@safern perhaps you'd like to do this?
Porting it now.
Can we also port this to 2.0?
This is not going to meet the bar to port to 2.0 given that it will be very soon superseded by 2.1 and our support policy
safern
No branches or pull requests
HashSet is likely prone to the same expensive hang as it uses essentially the same datastructures.
We should port dotnet/coreclr#16991 to Hashset.
cc @benaadams
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: