We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Web APIs are everywhere these days and there's still no way to manipulate them in the framework.
System.Web has one. System.ServiceModel has another. And pretty much every library that needs it has one.
System.Web
System.ServiceModel
It would be nice to have something that:
NameValueCollection
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Triage: @paulomorgado which types exist in System.Web and System.ServiceModel? We should consider extending UriBuilder.
UriBuilder
@paulomorgado what kind of value manipulation do you need and why?
Sorry, something went wrong.
In System.Web you can find System.Web.HttpValueCollection.
System.Web.HttpValueCollection
If HttpValueCollection was public and all it's issues were fixed, it could be used besides UrlBuilder like it is on System.Web.
HttpValueCollection
UrlBuilder
Or maybe it's a set of parsing and rendering extension methods on NameValueCollection would be enough.
Closing in favour of #32606
No branches or pull requests
Web APIs are everywhere these days and there's still no way to manipulate them in the framework.
System.Web
has one.System.ServiceModel
has another. And pretty much every library that needs it has one.It would be nice to have something that:
NameValueCollection
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: