Host: Consider removing of destructors on types used for statics

[swaroop-sridhar]

@janvorli wrote:
I wonder if we could rather get rid of destructors on types used for statics. We've done that in coreclr long time ago as it was just causing troubles due to the fact that the order of destruction of such objects is undefined and if one ends up referencing the other or something similar, it can cause all kinds of funny issues.

CC: @am11
Ref: #36527

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @vitek-karas, @swaroop-sridhar
Notify danmosemsft if you want to be subscribed.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Due to lack of recent activity, this issue has been marked as a candidate for backlog cleanup. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 14 more days. Any new comment (by anyone, not necessarily the author) will undo this process.

This process is part of our issue cleanup automation.

[dotnet-policy-service]

This issue will now be closed since it had been marked no-recent-activity but received no further activity in the past 14 days. It is still possible to reopen or comment on the issue, but please note that the issue will be locked if it remains inactive for another 30 days.