Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Yml: Use rids instead of "Platform" #37650

Closed
ViktorHofer opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Yml: Use rids instead of "Platform" #37650

ViktorHofer opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Currently we use a "Platform" layout instead of RID. Except for the delimiter and the casing, both formats are identical:

      targetRid: ios-arm64
      platform: iOS_arm64

Unfortunately for Windows this isn't true:

      targetRid: win-arm
      platform: Windows_NT_arm

Mono will publish the runtime targeting packs which contain the rid in the directory name as part of libraries's build-job.yml, hence the RID needs to be available. I suggest that we replace the made-up "Platform" format with the RID layout.

cc @safern @premun

@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added area-Infrastructure-libraries untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Jun 9, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 9, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @safern, @ViktorHofer
Notify danmosemsft if you want to be subscribed.

@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented Jun 9, 2020

I think this makes sense, but maybe should be part of: #32451 ?

@Anipik Anipik added this to the Future milestone Jun 24, 2020
@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 8, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

Due to lack of recent activity, this issue has been marked as a candidate for backlog cleanup. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 14 more days. Any new comment (by anyone, not necessarily the author) will undo this process.

This process is part of our issue cleanup automation.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added backlog-cleanup-candidate An inactive issue that has been marked for automated closure. no-recent-activity labels Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

This issue will now be closed since it had been marked no-recent-activity but received no further activity in the past 14 days. It is still possible to reopen or comment on the issue, but please note that the issue will be locked if it remains inactive for another 30 days.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed this from the Future milestone Jan 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 21, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed no-recent-activity backlog-cleanup-candidate An inactive issue that has been marked for automated closure. labels Feb 21, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants