You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi.
I was asked if I had any further feedback on the JSON Serializer in ticket: #56995
One thing that came to mind is that in my experiments generating a deserialize method can lead to performance improvements.
I suspect you considered it and for some reason not implemented it but in case you are interested my testing shows an increase in performance with ~30% for a simple object when using generated code rather than metadata driven deserializer. In addition it seems to have positive impact on the memory aspect.
Hi.
I was asked if I had any further feedback on the JSON Serializer in ticket: #56995
One thing that came to mind is that in my experiments generating a deserialize method can lead to performance improvements.
I suspect you considered it and for some reason not implemented it but in case you are interested my testing shows an increase in performance with ~30% for a simple object when using generated code rather than metadata driven deserializer. In addition it seems to have positive impact on the memory aspect.
Hi.
I was asked if I had any further feedback on the JSON Serializer in ticket: #56995
One thing that came to mind is that in my experiments generating a deserialize method can lead to performance improvements.
I suspect you considered it and for some reason not implemented it but in case you are interested my testing shows an increase in performance with ~30% for a simple object when using generated code rather than metadata driven deserializer. In addition it seems to have positive impact on the memory aspect.
In case you are interested here is my experiment: https://github.com/mrange/T4JsonSerializer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: