Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test failure JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll #93448

Closed
v-wenyuxu opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs os-windows

Comments

@v-wenyuxu
Copy link

Failed in: runtime-coreclr outerloop 20231012.12

Failed tests:

coreclr windows arm64 Checked no_tiered_compilation @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
R2R-CG2 windows arm64 Checked @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll
R2R-CG2 windows arm64 Checked no_tiered_compilation @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll

Error message:

Assert.Equal() Failure
Expected: 100
Actual:   101

Stack trace:

   at Xunit.Assert.Equal[T](T expected, T actual, IEqualityComparer`1 comparer) in /_/src/xunit.assert/Asserts/EqualityAsserts.cs:line 96
   at Program.<<Main>$>g__TestExecutor235|0_236(StreamWriter tempLogSw, StreamWriter statsCsvSw, <>c__DisplayClass0_0&)
@v-wenyuxu v-wenyuxu added arch-arm64 os-windows blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs labels Oct 13, 2023
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Oct 13, 2023
@ghost ghost added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Oct 13, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 13, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Failed in: runtime-coreclr outerloop 20231012.12

Failed tests:

coreclr windows arm64 Checked no_tiered_compilation @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
R2R-CG2 windows arm64 Checked @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll
R2R-CG2 windows arm64 Checked no_tiered_compilation @ Windows.11.Arm64.Open
    - JIT/Directed/ConstantFolding/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro/value_numbering_checked_arithmetic_with_constants_ro.dll
    - JIT/jit64/rtchecks/overflow/overflow02_mul/overflow02_mul.dll
    - JIT/IL_Conformance/Old/Conformance_Base/ldc_mul_ovf_i4/ldc_mul_ovf_i4.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M12-Beta2/b71869/b71869/b71869.dll
    - JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V1-M09.5-PDC/b25815/b25815/b25815.dll

Error message:

Assert.Equal() Failure
Expected: 100
Actual:   101

Stack trace:

   at Xunit.Assert.Equal[T](T expected, T actual, IEqualityComparer`1 comparer) in /_/src/xunit.assert/Asserts/EqualityAsserts.cs:line 96
   at Program.<<Main>$>g__TestExecutor235|0_236(StreamWriter tempLogSw, StreamWriter statsCsvSw, <>c__DisplayClass0_0&)
Author: v-wenyuxu
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-arm64, os-windows, area-CodeGen-coreclr, blocking-outerloop

Milestone: -

@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #93441

@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch marked this as a duplicate of #93441 Oct 13, 2023
@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 13, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Oct 13, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs os-windows
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants