Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test project templates use latest C# language idioms #164

Closed
Tracked by #3359
DamianEdwards opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #168
Closed
Tracked by #3359

Test project templates use latest C# language idioms #164

DamianEdwards opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #168
Assignees

Comments

@DamianEdwards
Copy link
Member

In .NET 6, the included C# project templates will use the latest language idioms.

See the parent Epic for details.

@kendrahavens

@Sanan07
Copy link
Contributor

Sanan07 commented Jun 30, 2021

@DamianEdwards Should we add all mentioned features to our template? For instance, we do not have Program.cs file in our test template.
I assume only some of them applied in our case.

@Haplois
Copy link
Contributor

Haplois commented Jun 30, 2021

@Sanan07, we cannot apply bellow yet:

These can be considered:

// cc: @nohwnd

@DamianEdwards
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @Haplois. Yes the intent is to make only those changes that are applicable and to follow up on any issues that are preventing a change that could be made, being made.

@Haplois
Copy link
Contributor

Haplois commented Jul 12, 2021

File-scoped namespaces are blocked by dotnet/roslyn#54781.

@DamianEdwards
Copy link
Member Author

@Haplois this should be unblocked now as of the latest SDK builds for preview.7 from main

@Haplois Haplois removed the blocked label Jul 15, 2021
@Haplois
Copy link
Contributor

Haplois commented Jul 15, 2021

@DamianEdwards, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants