Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transition away from GitHub #281

Closed
tmiw opened this issue Sep 24, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Transition away from GitHub #281

tmiw opened this issue Sep 24, 2022 · 7 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@tmiw
Copy link
Collaborator

tmiw commented Sep 24, 2022

Now that we're under the Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC), we'll need to figure out a plan for transitioning away from GitHub (context here). This issue is being created to track this task.

TODO:

  • Research Git hosting providers (GitLab, SFC's own, etc.)
  • Select Git hosting provider (w/vote by the Leadership Team)
  • Clone current repo at new provider
  • Re-enable/port CI tasks as appropriate
  • Add link from GitHub to new location
  • Make repository read-only mirror of new location
  • Determine future date when to delete GitHub repository entirely

Related issues on other projects: codec2 (https://github.com/drowe67/codec2/issues/354), LPCNet (drowe67/LPCNet#46), ezDV (tmiw/ezDV#13)

@tmiw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmiw commented Sep 24, 2022

Tagging @drowe67 and @Tyrbiter for feedback/discussion.

@Tyrbiter
Copy link

My immediate thought is how to determine whether wherever the repository moves to will be safe in future, or is this a repeating task as circumstances change. I imagine that it's not sensible to limit ourselves to the 2 year horizon of the current application.

@tmiw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmiw commented Sep 26, 2022

My immediate thought is how to determine whether wherever the repository moves to will be safe in future, or is this a repeating task as circumstances change. I imagine that it's not sensible to limit ourselves to the 2 year horizon of the current application.

We can't see into the future but I suspect we'd be safe for a while with any of the other well-known ones. We'll have to discuss more offline during the selection process.

@Tyrbiter
Copy link

I have been having a look at this article:

https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/github-alternatives/

For my first thought, I see some listed as 'free plan' as an opposite to 'paid plan' but some others show as 'complete open source and free'. I assume that is free of charge as well as using Free Software? As someone who is not intimately involved with software development it's not easy to rationalise the different offerings where a technology/features vs stance on Software Freedom decision might be important. There's not much point in using a service which might vanish if it can't pay its bills.

I also read the link @tmiw posted, it looks like there are some other possibilities not covered in the link I found.

Anyway, just throwing some thoughts out there. I hope this isn't as complicated as it seems.

@tmiw tmiw added the question Further information is requested label Jun 3, 2023
@barjac
Copy link

barjac commented Oct 29, 2023

I happened across this recently, but know nothing more:

https://codeberg.org/

@drowe67
Copy link
Owner

drowe67 commented Oct 24, 2024

@tmiw is this issue dead and can this closed?

@tmiw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmiw commented Oct 24, 2024

@tmiw is this issue dead and can this closed?

Theoretically we're still supposed to do this at some point. However, we haven't been pushed to (i.e. with imposed deadlines) and I'm not sure we will any time soon. I added a spot at the top of the meeting minutes document so we don't forget about it and will close for now.

@tmiw tmiw closed this as completed Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants