Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Use Case: Scatterometer wind data #1488

Closed
23 tasks
j-opatz opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2324
Closed
23 tasks

New Use Case: Scatterometer wind data #1488

j-opatz opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2324
Assignees
Labels
alert: NEED ACCOUNT KEY Need to assign an account key to this issue priority: high High Priority requestor: NOAA/OPC NOAA Ocean Prediction Center required: FOR OFFICIAL RELEASE Required to be completed in the official release for the assigned milestone type: new use case Add a new use case
Milestone

Comments

@j-opatz
Copy link
Contributor

j-opatz commented Mar 7, 2022

Describe the New Use Case

To start OPC's verification process in METplus, the priority has been for ASCAT winds. While we concurrently develop a use case for the altimeter wave heights in #1482, focus will remain on this use case.

OPC has warned in previous meetings that scatterometer winds can have many dead ends, and this use case will need to utilize a script from Frances to get the ASCAT data in a MET-accessible format. Those files are attached.
convert_altimeter_hdf5_to_ascii.py.txt
get_sentinel_data.pl.txt
MGDRlite2ascii.py.txt

Use Case Name and Category

Use case name is unknown for now, but should follow:
PointStat_fcstGDAS_obsASCAT_satelliteWinds

This use case can reside in the Marine_and_Cryosphere category, as it deals with winds over oceans.

Input Data

Fcst source: GDAS 10m winds
Obs source: Scatterometer data (need size, type) link to webpage that showcases the data. Obs data will require preprocessing via Python script.

Acceptance Testing

Success of this use case will be two things: a successful run through METplus with the datasets listed above, and meaningful output for OPC that their center can utilize.

As use case develops, provide a run time here

Time Estimate

1-3 days
Issues should represent approximately 1 to 3 days of work.

Sub-Issues

Consider breaking the new feature down into sub-issues.

  • Add a checkbox for each sub-issue here.

Relevant Deadlines

List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.

Funding Source

Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.

Define the Metadata

Assignee

  • Select engineer(s) or no engineer required
  • Select scientist(s) or no scientist required

Labels

  • Select component(s)
  • Select priority
  • Select requestor(s)
  • Select privacy

Projects and Milestone

  • Select Repository and/or Organization level Project(s) or add alert: NEED PROJECT ASSIGNMENT label
  • Select Milestone as the next official version or Future Versions

Define Related Issue(s)

Consider the impact to the other METplus components.

New Use Case Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Complete the issue definition above, including the Time Estimate and Funding source.
  • Fork this repository or create a branch of develop.
    Branch name: feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>
  • Complete the development and test your changes.
  • Add/update log messages for easier debugging.
  • Add/update unit tests.
  • Add/update documentation.
  • Push local changes to GitHub.
  • Submit a pull request to merge into develop.
    Pull request: feature <Issue Number> <Description>
  • Define the pull request metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Linked issues
    Select: Repository level development cycle Project for the next official release
    Select: Milestone as the next official version
  • Iterate until the reviewer(s) accept your changes. Merge branch into develop.
  • Create a second pull request to merge develop into develop-ref, following the same steps for the first pull request.
  • Delete your fork or branch.
  • Close this issue.
@j-opatz j-opatz added priority: high High Priority alert: NEED MORE DEFINITION Not yet actionable, additional definition required alert: NEED ACCOUNT KEY Need to assign an account key to this issue type: new use case Add a new use case requestor: NOAA/OPC NOAA Ocean Prediction Center required: FOR DEVELOPMENT RELEASE Required to be completed in the development release for the assigned project labels Mar 7, 2022
@j-opatz j-opatz added this to the METplus-5.0.0 milestone Mar 7, 2022
@j-opatz j-opatz self-assigned this Mar 7, 2022
@j-opatz j-opatz added required: FOR OFFICIAL RELEASE Required to be completed in the official release for the assigned milestone and removed alert: NEED MORE DEFINITION Not yet actionable, additional definition required required: FOR DEVELOPMENT RELEASE Required to be completed in the development release for the assigned project labels Sep 8, 2022
@j-opatz
Copy link
Contributor Author

j-opatz commented Aug 14, 2023

The following is new guidance from OPC with regards to the verification process:

start with a PointStat verification case for the ASCAT winds versus the GFS forecast winds. We're looking to verify the ocean winds over these two basins (separately):
N. Pac: Equator to 67N, and 180 to the coast of S. America
N. Atl: Equator to 67N, and from the coast to 35W

As such, the new name for this use case will be

PointStat_fcstGFS_obsASCAT_satelliteWinds

And will utilize the masking option for the two regions indicated. Further, the WATERSF message type will be changed to add SATWND and WDSATR, which will allow the land_mask dictionary to also be used for only water gridpoints.

@j-opatz
Copy link
Contributor Author

j-opatz commented Aug 15, 2023

While the Atlantic verification area should be straightforward via a self-created poly file, the N. Pacific region indicated will require the creation of a new mask. This mask can be made by creating the borders as described by EMC, then subtracting out the CAR.poly and GLF.poly files. The land that is left will be ignored by the use of the land_mask dictionary.

@j-opatz j-opatz moved this from Todo to In Progress in METplus-Wrappers-6.0.0 Development Aug 24, 2023
@j-opatz j-opatz linked a pull request Aug 29, 2023 that will close this issue
14 tasks
@j-opatz j-opatz moved this from In Progress to Review in METplus-Wrappers-6.0.0 Development Aug 31, 2023
@j-opatz j-opatz closed this as completed Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
alert: NEED ACCOUNT KEY Need to assign an account key to this issue priority: high High Priority requestor: NOAA/OPC NOAA Ocean Prediction Center required: FOR OFFICIAL RELEASE Required to be completed in the official release for the assigned milestone type: new use case Add a new use case
Projects
No open projects
Status: 🏁 Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants