Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cursor vs Keyset-based Pagination #67

Open
unthought opened this issue Apr 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Cursor vs Keyset-based Pagination #67

unthought opened this issue Apr 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@unthought
Copy link

Is there any chance that you could change the documentation (and repo title) and possibly replace and deprecate the cursor_ parameters with keyset_ parameters? Using 'Cursor' to describe what the library does gives the wrong impression about it's implementation, and leads to teams using inaccurate language, which just leads to unnecessary arguments, and confusion when searching on Google without reading the excellent links you provide in the README.

Love the library, we're currently moving our production system to it. Many thanks.

@thojanssens
Copy link

@unthought I think cursor pagination and keyset pagination may be used interchangeably? If not could you mention why cursor is a misleading name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants