Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

train and val on mot16 #24

Closed
iamZe opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

train and val on mot16 #24

iamZe opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@iamZe
Copy link

iamZe commented Oct 27, 2020

Hello sir, nice work!

may I know what I need to do if I need to do training on mot16? Thanks.

@Newdxz
Copy link

Newdxz commented Oct 30, 2020

hello,Did you run this program correctly,I encountered some problems in the evaluate, can I ask you something, Thanks

@guillembraso
Copy link
Collaborator

guillembraso commented Nov 1, 2020

Dear @iamZe,

Thanks for your kind comment! MOT16 contains the same sequences as MOT17, but MOT17 has improved annotations. As for the public detections, MOT17's DPM detections are exactly the same ones given as MOT16 public detections. Hence, using MOT17 is preferable to using MOT16.

If you still want to train on MOT16, you'd have to download the annotations from this link, and extract them in DATA_PATH. Then you could essentially reuse the code in src/mot_neural_solver/data/seq_processing/MOTCha_loader.py used for the MOT17 dataset to load MOT16 annotations / detection files. Hope this was clear.

If you need further help please let me know!

@guillembraso
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Newdxz . What problem did you encounter? there was a typo in the configuration file path in scripts/evaluate.py. It was written configs/tracking_config.yaml instead of configs/tracking_cfg.yaml. But I have now fixed it. If you were facing a different problem, then please open a separate issue for it. Thanks!!

@iamZe
Copy link
Author

iamZe commented Nov 2, 2020

@Newdxz sure, lets figure out problems together

@guillembraso
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi!
If I'm not mistaken, @Newdxz problems were already addressed in #22. Am I right?
@iamZe do you still need help with MOT16, or can I close this issue?

@iamZe
Copy link
Author

iamZe commented Nov 9, 2020

yes please @gbraso

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants