You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can we generalise the feedback system into an embeddable "widget" that:
Can be embedded on any web page on the internet using a single line of JavaScript.
Linked to via "Short URL" from any social-media post (anywhere JS cannot be run)
Renders as SVG when JS is not available (e.g. on AMP Pages)
Does not require any customisation from the person using the widget on their web page
Can we avoid having API Keys and simply read the URL from the requesting page?
What are the security/privacy implications of not having an API Key?
(can requests be spoofed? how do we mitigate that?)
OR if we cannot get around having an API Key (because it's impossible to "protect"),
how do we make it easy for the person copy-pasting the Widget Code?
Can be customised if required ... Users can submit their ideas for how they want to customise. e.g:
Theme/Branding customisation (is this where the revenue is...?)
Focus the Feedback widget when the person gets to the end of scrolling on a page
Expand a qualitative feedback widget/form when "dwell time" on a page crosses a thresshold
One option is to have a Feedback (<button>) shown on the page (usually sidebar):
But it requires two clicks. (first the user must click on the "Feedback" button, then leave feedback)
A "zero friction" approach UX/UI is:
Interesting how they have a "bias" to "happy" (in the ordering of the feedback/reaction emojies) https://vuukle.com
[User]
Anonymity by default >> Privacy by Design First/Always!
We feel that one of the tenants of a good feedback system is anonymity to encourage people to leave honest feedback without "fear" of "repercussions".
This means the person leaving the feedback should not be required to "login" or provide an Email address before they are allowed to leave quantitative or (basic) qualitative feedback.
No "Signup", "Login" or Email Address required.
Anonymity == SPAM ?
Creating an anonymous system means the vast majority of the development work is "back-end".
Because all systems on the internet which allow any sort of user-input are SPAM-magnets!!
Our System needs to handle the SPAM/DDOS 😞 (we may need to use CloudFlare ...? 🤔)
Optional Login or Registration (to receive response)
If the person leaving feedback wants to be kept informed of the response, status our trend on the feedback they have left, they can optionally login (using their sosh) or register using an email address and we will forward any updates to them.
We need to make it clear to "Page Owners" and Feedback leavers that Email Addresses will never be shared with the "Page Owner" or person requesting the feedback.
Email/Notifications are handled by the system and Zero personal data is "leaked".
[Page Owner]
The "Page Owner" can
Easily embed the feedback widget in their website/app with a single JS line and no experience.
Immediately see feedback in real-time.
Receive Notifications when someone is currently on their page! (so they can respond to feedback in real-time)
Respond to qualitative feedback in a Chat-like interface (one-on-one)
Chose to display the feedback on the page where the feedback was original created.
Chose to hide the feedback if it's clearly defamatory/trolling/spam or against policy.
Free?
Can we make this a free service?
I've been quietly running Free GitHub Page View Counter service for the past couple of years ...
And it's reasonably popular while only costing me $5/month see: dwyl/product-roadmap#7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can we generalise the feedback system into an embeddable "widget" that:
(can requests be spoofed? how do we mitigate that?)
how do we make it easy for the person copy-pasting the Widget Code?
One option is to have a
Feedback
(<button>
) shown on the page (usually sidebar):But it requires two clicks. (first the user must click on the "Feedback" button, then leave feedback)
A "zero friction" approach UX/UI is:
Interesting how they have a "bias" to "happy" (in the ordering of the feedback/reaction emojies)
https://vuukle.com
[User]
Anonymity by
default
>> Privacy by Design First/Always!We feel that one of the tenants of a good feedback system is anonymity to encourage people to leave honest feedback without "fear" of "repercussions".
This means the person leaving the feedback should not be required to "login" or provide an Email address before they are allowed to leave quantitative or (basic) qualitative feedback.
Anonymity ==
SPAM
?Creating an anonymous system means the vast majority of the development work is "back-end".
Because all systems on the internet which allow any sort of user-input are SPAM-magnets!!
see: https://github.com/dwyl/phoenix-ecto-encryption-example
Optional Login or Registration (to receive response)
If the person leaving feedback wants to be kept informed of the response, status our trend on the feedback they have left, they can optionally login (using their sosh) or register using an email address and we will forward any updates to them.
[Page Owner]
The "Page Owner" can
Free?
Can we make this a free service?
I've been quietly running Free GitHub Page View Counter service for the past couple of years ...
And it's reasonably popular while only costing me $5/month see: dwyl/product-roadmap#7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: