-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Toggl #34
Comments
Features: https://toggl.com/features a graphic of a levitating lady telekinetically juggling random objects: Pricing: https://toggl.com/pricing 💸 Their landing page(s) used to be much better. ⌛️ |
First thing I'm greeted with is a modal:
Why not just let me start using the product before showing me this noise? https://toggl.com/app/timer want to create a project, that's a modal too ... Tracking my time on this task: And we're off to the races! (who ever tracks the most time in Toggl get's a prize!) 🥇 |
I've been on the site for 0 seconds and they've already tried to upsell - I can hire a "certified" TOGGL "consultant" to set it up for my team! (I instinctively dismissed it before taking a screenshot, sorry) |
@rub1e scroll up for the "consultant" modal. 😉 |
You can't attribute a block of time to more than one project. E.g. I've just been checking my notifications and planning my day which has consisted of things both for 'Time' and 'Club Soda' but toggl will only let me attribute that block of time to one or the other. I suppose I might expect it to allow me to attribute it to multiple projects but then divide the amount of time by the number of projects...? I can see how/why it might be confusing but at the same time I feel like there should be a solution. |
I don't like it. It feels infantilising.
Perhaps this says more about my way of working than anything else... I just don't find timers a particularly accurate way of tracking my time. For example, if I'm doing a lengthy task and an email comes in which I can (Though I appreciate this might fall into the "operator error" category)
There's an old Eddie Izzard gag about how the first thing a man does upon purchasing a new printer is to fling the instructions out of the window I kinda want online productivity tools to be the sort of thing where I can fling the instructions out of the window... ... which this kinda does. I created an account, typed the activity I was doing, hit Enter and the timer started. Which is great! But... ... Now what? I get the impression that to use this for anything other than ad-hoc time tracking, I'd have to set up a bunch of categories and labels and projects and then wait a few months before there was enough data in there to actually analyse... ... and then I'd have to spend time learning how to do the analysis! (And I'm really anxious that whatever data I do collect on my habits will be useless, because I didn't set up the right labels/categories/etc. in the first place) |
@rub1e we agree that the UX can be improved. And that we need a way of context switching from one activity to the other when the "quick task" (like answering an email) is "only 2mins". Want to "Be more effective. Upgrade now" ... This is the kind of nonsense "up-sell" we will avoid. Transition from "another system" ... how do you know that I've been using another system? 😕 |
If you click on the annoying RED "Upgrade now" button, this is what you see: That URL should give you some insight into how many user accounts are on the Toggl system. 3,207,297 people have tried Toggl (implied)And the "/all-plans" route is custom-generated based on your user "cohort". (not "main" pricing page!) |
I can't stop looking at that red button. It's almost offensive, the idea that you'll instantly become a more effective person if you click here and enter your credit card details. Imagine if Waist-Watchers had a button saying "Get thinner. Upgrade now" Good insight re the /all-plans route 👍 |
The irrelevant modal noise is starting to grate me ... If anyone seeing this "Meme" hasn't watched "Office Space": https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0151804 |
@Cleop yeah, the ability to retrospectively update the start or end of a timer is a useful feature. Have you noticed how if the time ticks over from AM to PM you have to manually change that? Also, if you forget to start a timer the previous day, (not that anyone should be working past midnight!) I think this is a good "constraint" because it means people cannot retrospectively "invent" how they spent their time and instead are forced to track what they do |
|
I definitely agree re what to do with very small chunks of time context switches e.g. someone gitter messages you, checking github notifications, coffee/toilet break etc. I suppose it's somewhat down to the individual to determine at what point these small chunks of time are significant e.g. popping to the kitchen to top up a water bottle might not be worth switching for, whereas popping to the kitchen for a pomodoro break and making a coffee that takes time to brew whilst having kitchen small talk might be considered worth logging. I suppose it is also determined by what purpose you're using the app for e.g. if you're a freelancer then I imagine you still bill for a coffee break so I don't know if in that situation they'd include it as part of their task time? But if you're not freelance maybe you want to get an idea of whether those 2min coffee breaks really are 2mins / how much caffeine you are consuming (/how much money you are giving to Starbucks) / what your concentration patterns are / |
I was just taking a glance at my Toggl and noticed I've not been keeping up assigning my tasks to projects as diligently as when I first began. I think I'm somewhat disappointed by the github integration. So far all I've noticed that does is import a list of my project names (which as I said before doesn't include other orgs you're part of, just personal repos which isn't very useful for me.) I think it would be better (if it's possible) if it could assign things to a project automatically by analysing a github issue url or similar. I feel like if I'm someone trying to give this a good shot and I forgot to assign a project within under a week, then I certainly won't be alone. The more we can automate, the better 😊 Also, a separate point but relating to my comment above. I wonder whether we should be integrating goal setting into our timing (probably something @nelsonic and @iteles have already thought of 😂 ). I was just thinking about the reasons I made above for how you'd dissect small chunks of time in your day; whether they'd be lumped together into a 'productive' task or whether you'd skim them out and realise you'd spent 30mins that day on getting a drink alone. It might not be for everyone e.g. if you're just tracking for time sheets and don't care about your employer or believe in wanting to improve your productivity. But I feel like maybe if people had the ability to set a goal for their time keeping it might encourage them to be honest or to think about how tracking their time can be beneficial for them or if there are any changes they make. For example you might realise that context switching and time on gitter is taking up 1hr a day when you thought it was just a minute here and a minute there and maybe it would encourage you to change how frequently you check or what kind of notifications you set up. |
@Cleop Good thoughts! Just so you know, if you use the exact same name for them, they group automatically. |
@rub1e - yes I use and like that functionality. It's more that sometimes I'll start something in the top bar (for convenience) and then forget I had an existing entry (or the name of the existing entry) and so end up giving it a new name. For those who have a strict naming convention I'm sure it wouldn't be an issue but otherwise you can end up with several with almost similar names. I liked the idea of being able to retrospectively group things to have the same name or for the app to detect almost the same names and ask if they should be grouped. Maybe not something that would be useful in all contexts but just an idea... |
@Cleop good feature idea. please create the issue in: https://github.com/dwyl/time/issues 👍 |
My favourite toggl feature by far... (enough to take me away from the desktop app back to the browser) activenot
|
I just wanted to link this issue with another UX research issue for another app: dwyl/app#184 |
I've been using Toggl exclusively in the Web Browser because I feel that the UX in the Browser should be flawless and I should not be forced to download a "native" App in order to use the functionality! There are plenty of people who prefer to always us a "native" App because they have been conditioned by their Smartphone/OS vendor to discover Apps in the "App Store". 📱🙄 Early on in the Smart Phone "race", Apple aggressively marketed the This "operant conditioning" means that people often
A fairly major "gripe" I have is that when I visit the homepage: https://toggl.com I see the following: The homepage does not recognise me as an existing user, even though I am logged in. (in a diff tab) When I click on "Log in" I'm taken to https://toggl.com/login my Browser pre-populates the data: What I'm highlighting here is more of a "session management" issue than anything else. We can do much better! |
Today in our team call we emphasised the need to focus/renew our efforts to both estimate our tasks and effectively track the time against our estimates.
I asked the people on the call: "what online tool do you use for tracking the time on your current task?"
i.e. are you using a Pomodoro timer that is linked to your current task and is the data persisted online?
(there are many offline Pomodoro timers that do not save data to a web app, those don't count)
On the basis that the majority of people on the call are not using such a tool, I recommended that we all use Toggl https://toggl.com for the next few days to test the UX.
Todo: UX-Test Toggl by Using the App!
{issue-path} {issue-title} ({time-estimate})
e.g: "How to create/publish an Elixir package on Hex.pm learn-elixir#95 Writeup How to create a Hex.pm Package (4 hours)"
The next time we have an "all hands" call we will discuss our collective progress with this task.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: