Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge progress made by @diorcety #1

Open
jaromil opened this issue Sep 23, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

merge progress made by @diorcety #1

jaromil opened this issue Sep 23, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@jaromil
Copy link
Member

jaromil commented Sep 23, 2014

Big up to @diorcety for the recent progress made on FreeJ, seems pretty good to me.
https://github.com/diorcety/FreeJ
You are welcome to file a pull request when you think it is time for it.

@diorcety
Copy link

Wait wait, it's a WIP :D
I'm trying to improve the behaviour of FreeJ against Swig.
Indeed some object are shared between internal FreeJ structure and python for example. it can produce segfault following if the internal code delete the object. (double free for example)
For that i'm trying to use more std, split javascript/no_javascript code, cleanup, and at the end use shared_ptr to avoid the issue.
Can be a bit long :)

@jaromil
Copy link
Member Author

jaromil commented Sep 24, 2014

ack. yes the issue there was exactly what you point at. I never rly used python so the swig was a basic proof of concept for one-run scripts.

happy hacking, i'll be following.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants