-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Repository for Debian bullseye #124
Comments
Agreed :( |
Yes and no. For me it currently suffices to use the HWRaid buster repo packages on bullseye and installing the Actually still having to use the buster repo for bullseye causes more headaches for me in Ansible than I have issues with installing Thanks in advance! |
I have been using buster packages ( Now it looks I will have to get rid of Python2 because of other compatibility issues. For me only So I would be very happy if only |
Hello, It's on my list it will done before bullseye release or shortly after because I'll need it anyway. Regards, Adam. |
Adam (@eLvErDe) - thanks - I know that it's not trivial, and yet I made it sound like it was. Sorry. Sadly, using If you need help, esp. on the Ubuntu side, please let me know. |
I've also quickly hacked https://gist.github.com/gedia/80cf0881d9c96c0efdacd37f4f83408c |
Thanks for the efforts! Bullseye is now stable, any ETA on the bullseye repo? |
Hello, I published bullseye and focal repositories, but there's only megali/megaclisas-status package for the moment. Regards, Adam. |
This can be closed now, but the Bookworm repo is still missing, see #139. ;-) |
It's that time of the year I guess :-).
It's a little early for release, but it would be handy if there were a bullseye repo for testing etc. Thank you for all your work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: