Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move Dockerfiles to own grpc4bmi docker images repo #7

Open
sverhoeven opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Move Dockerfiles to own grpc4bmi docker images repo #7

sverhoeven opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@sverhoeven
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@sverhoeven sverhoeven mentioned this issue Oct 15, 2018
Open
@Peter9192
Copy link

I encountered this issue as I was trying to get a better overview of the eWaterCycle containers and their source files. What would be the envisioned mechanism? I would think something like:

  • Dockerfiles for BMI-enabled models in the models' source code repo (e.g. wflow-bmi)
  • A central repo containing Dockerfiles for each of the models used in eWaterCycle, which inherits from the above and only adds grpc4bmi server (e.g. wflow-grpc4bmi)

I guess that last repo is what this issue is suggesting, right? Would it make sense to re-purpose this repository to that effect? Or does this repo still have its own purpose to fulfill?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sverhoeven @Peter9192