-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Group managers are missing from the group and user views #77
Comments
@JoernT commented on Jan 8, 2019, 10:47 AM UTC: may well be my lack of understanding but i can't see something like a group manager for users when i take the java admin client as reference. For groups please see the checkbox 'is Manager' on the right of the list. This however seems to have a bug not displaying the right state. In my case when i select 'dba' group the group manager flag is set for 'admin' in the Java admin client but not in usermanager. This is something i can look after. |
@adamretter commented on Jan 8, 2019, 10:53 AM UTC: JoernT Group Manager in the Java Admin Client: |
@JoernT commented on Jan 8, 2019, 10:58 AM UTC: yes - saw that but that's groups right? Ticket title indicates that the same is true for users? Can't see that - however noticed that entries may be bold type in such cases? So probably this shall be the indicator here? |
@adamretter commented on Jan 8, 2019, 11:02 AM UTC: The ticket is about managers of groups. A group has members, each member is a user. A member of a group may also be flagged as a group manager. A group manager has permission to add and remove members from a group without being a DBA.
Hope that makes more sense now? |
@JoernT commented on Jan 8, 2019, 11:22 AM UTC: yep - makes sense. My confusion came from the fact that the current user manager in admin client just shows the group manager status for users as a bold entry in the group list (when being in 'edit user') |
@adamretter commented on Nov 8, 2018, 7:07 PM UTC:
This issue was moved by joewiz from eXist-db/existdb-dashboard#10.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: