title | summary |
---|---|
Troubleshoot Inconsistency Between Data and Indexes |
Learn how to deal with errors reported by the consistency check between data and indexes. |
TiDB checks consistency between data and indexes when it executes transactions or the ADMIN CHECK [TABLE|INDEX]
statement. If the check finds that a record key-value and the corresponding index key-value are inconsistent, that is, a key-value pair storing row data and the corresponding key-value pair storing its index are inconsistent (for example, more indexes or missing indexes), TiDB reports a data inconsistency error and prints the related errors in error logs.
This document describes the meanings of data inconsistency errors and provides some methods to bypass the consistency check. When a data consistency error occurs, contact PingCAP technical support for troubleshooting.
When inconsistency between data and indexes occurs, you can check TiDB error messages to know which item is inconsistent between row data and index data, or check the related error logs for further investigation.
This section lists the data inconsistency errors reported when TiDB executes transactions and explains the meanings of these errors with examples.
ERROR 8133 (HY000): data inconsistency in table: t, index: k2, index-count:1 != record-count:0
This error indicates that for the k2
index in table t
, the number of indexes in the table is 1 and the number of row records is 0. The number is inconsistent.
ERROR 8138 (HY000): writing inconsistent data in table: t, expected-values:{KindString green} != record-values:{KindString GREEN}
This error indicates that the transaction was attempting to write an incorrect row value. For the data to be written, the encoded row data does not match the original data before encoding.
ERROR 8139 (HY000): writing inconsistent data in table: t, index: i1, index-handle:4 != record-handle:3, index: tables.mutation{key:kv.Key{0x74, 0x80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x49, 0x5f, 0x69, 0x80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x1, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfc, 0x1, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfc, 0x3, 0x80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x4}, flags:0x0, value:[]uint8{0x30}, indexID:1}, record: tables.mutation{key:kv.Key{0x74, 0x80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x49, 0x5f, 0x72, 0x80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3}, flags:0xd, value:[]uint8{0x80, 0x0, 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x2, 0x5, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f}, indexID:0}
This error indicates that the handle (that is, the key of the row data) of the data to be written is inconsistent. For index i1
in table t
, the row to be written by the transaction has a handle of 4 in the index key-value pair and a handle of 3 in the row record key-value pair. The data of this row will not be written.
ERROR 8140 (HY000): writing inconsistent data in table: t, index: i2, col: c1, indexed-value:{KindString hellp} != record-value:{KindString hello}
This error indicates that the data in a row to be written by the transaction does not match the data in the index. For index i2
in table t
, a row to be written by the transaction has data hellp
in the index key-value pair and data hello
in the record key-value pair. The data of this row will not be written.
ERROR 8141 (HY000): assertion failed: key: 7480000000000000405f72013300000000000000f8, assertion: NotExist, start_ts: 430590532931813377, existing start ts: 430590532931551233, existing commit ts: 430590532931551234
This error indicates that the assertion failed when a transaction was being committed. Assuming that data and indexes are consistent, TiDB asserted that the key 7480000000000000405f720133000000000000000000f8
did not exist. When the transaction was being committed, TiDB found the key did exist, written by the transaction with the start ts
430590532931551233
. TiDB will print the Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) history of this key to logs.
This section lists the data inconsistency errors that might occur in TiDB when you execute the ADMIN CHECK [TABLE|INDEX]
statement, and explains the meanings of these errors with examples.
ERROR 8003 (HY000): table count 3 != index(idx) count 2
This error indicates that the table on which the ADMIN CHECK
statement is executed has 3 row key-value pairs but only 2 index key-value pairs.
ERROR 8134 (HY000): data inconsistency in table: t, index: c2, col: c2, handle: "2", index-values:"KindInt64 13" != record-values:"KindInt64 12", compare err:<nil>
This error indicates that for index c2
in table t
, the value of column c2
has the following inconsistency:
- In the index key-value pair of the row whose handle is
2
, the value of columnc2
is13
. - In the row record key-value pair, the value of column
c2
is12
.
ERROR 8223 (HY000): data inconsistency in table: t2, index: i1, handle: {hello, hello}, index-values:"" != record-values:"handle: {hello, hello}, values: [KindString hello KindString hello]"
This error indicates that index-values
are null and record-values
are not null, meaning that there is no corresponding index for the row.
If you encounter a data inconsistency error, contact PingCAP technical support for troubleshooting immediately instead of dealing with the error by yourself. If your application needs to skip such errors urgently, you can use the following methods to bypass the check.
If the data inconsistency error occurs in a particular SQL statement only, you can bypass this error by rewriting the SQL statement to another equivalent form using different execution operators.
For the following errors reported in transaction execution, you can bypass the corresponding checks:
- To bypass the checks of errors 8138, 8139, and 8140, configure
set @@tidb_enable_mutation_checker=0
. - To bypass the checks of error 8141, configure
set @@tidb_txn_assertion_level=OFF
.
Note:
Disabling
tidb_enable_mutation_checker
andtidb_txn_assertion_level
will bypass the corresponding checks of all SQL statements.
For other errors reported in transaction execution and all errors reported during the execution of the ADMIN CHECK [TABLE|INDEX]
statement, you cannot bypass the corresponding check, because the data is already inconsistent.