We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
There are two test errors with Java 10:
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.053 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiatorTest testInternalInstantiator(org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiatorTest) Time elapsed: 0.014 sec <<< ERROR! java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiator$$$EmptyClass loaded by jdk/internal/loader/ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader cannot access jdk/internal/reflect superclass jdk.internal.reflect.MagicAccessorImpl at org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiatorTest.testInternalInstantiator(MagicInstantiatorTest.java:51) testNewInstance(org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiatorTest) Time elapsed: 0 sec <<< ERROR! java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiator$$$EmptyClass loaded by jdk/internal/loader/ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader cannot access jdk/internal/reflect superclass jdk.internal.reflect.MagicAccessorImpl at org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.MagicInstantiatorTest.testNewInstance(MagicInstantiatorTest.java:42)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Interesting. Thanks. Yes. The Magic concept was indeed removed so this test should be ignored to Java 10.
Sorry, something went wrong.
2c1e411
Thank you for the quick fix.
henri-tremblay
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
There are two test errors with Java 10:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: