You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{
"name": "name of field (e.g. column name)",
"title": "A nicer human readable label or title for the field",
"type": "A string specifying the type",
"format": "A string specifying a format",
"example": "An example value for the field",
"description": "A description for the field",
"constraints": {
//aconstraints-descriptor
}
}
echemdb should have something like this:
{
"name": "name of field (e.g. column name)",
"title": "A nicer human readable label or title for the field",
"dimension": "The dimension of the field",
"unit": "The unit of the field",
"description": "A description for the field",
"reference": "Applicable to fields with a potential",
}
currently, it looks somewhat like this:
names = ['t', 'E', 'I', 'j']
Since they should be unique 'E' is not so smart since
it can be E of the working electrode or E of a secondary electrode.
(the same thing applies to j and I)
't' could also be the absolute time or the relative time.
I suggest the following change suggestion:
names = ['t_rel', 't_abs', 'E_WE', 'E_CE', 'E_collector', 'j_WE', 'j_CE']# the titles could be composed of 'dimension' and 'unit'. # Here we do not distinguish between working and counter elecrodetitle = ['t [s]', 'E [V vs Ref]', 'E [V]']# the description could contain more information on the fielddescription_E_WE = 'Working electrode potential'description_j_collector = 'current density at the ring electrode'# what we need for echemdb (including things that might come and are already relevant in the lab)names = ['t_rel', 't_abs', 'E_WE', 'E_CE', 'E_collector', 'j_WE', 'j_CE', 'j_collector','I_WE', 'I_CE', 'I_collector']
Finally an example:
fields:
- name: t_reloriginal name: time (s) title: t [s]dimension: tunit: sdescription: The relative time with respect to the first data point in this series.
- name: E_WE2original name: WE(2).potential (V)title: E [V vs RHE]dimension: Eunit: Vdescription: Potential at the secondary collector electrode.reference: RHE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some thoughts on creating a metadata standard for the field description in the echemdb datapackage.
From frictionless fields schema
echemdb should have something like this:
currently, it looks somewhat like this:
names = ['t', 'E', 'I', 'j']
Since they should be unique 'E' is not so smart since
it can be E of the working electrode or E of a secondary electrode.
(the same thing applies to j and I)
't' could also be the absolute time or the relative time.
I suggest the following change suggestion:
Finally an example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: