IDD 5.0 review discussion - Orchestration-store-management

[AlexChiquito]

In this Issue we will collect the comments about the orchestration-store-management interface definition.

[emanuelpalm]

Link to reviewed document: eu.arrowhead.orchestration-store-management-http-json.yml.

[borditamas]

AITIA review comments

• File name should be 'service-orchestration-simple-store-management'
• There is an inconsistency between the IDD and the SysD. SysD name this simple-store-management service, but IDD names orchestration-management-api
• Every create, delete, modify operation should be bulk.
• "configuration" phrase in the operation is confusing since there is the Configuration Support System. This one should be prefixed or renamed to emphasize the difference.

---

roadmap/5.0 Draft/IDD/IDDs Orchestration System/eu.arrowhead.orchestration-store-management-http-json.yml

Lines 162 to 169 in 5a4f4b2

	put:
	summary: Set Active Configuration
	requestBody:
	required: true
	content:
	application/json:
	schema:
	$ref: '#/components/schemas/ActiveConfiguration'

Why setting the active configuration requires to define the rules again?

[borditamas]

@AlexChiquito @emanuelpalm @PerOlofsson-Sinetiq
Could you please provide Sinetiq's feedback before the next RoadMap (05.02) in order to being able to discuss it there?
As you know, last time the 14th of May (before AIMS 5.0 GA) was agreed to target the specification being finalized, so we don't have so much time.