-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Actual bugs for intelligence commands #4511
Comments
@slemeur, @TylerJewell So, QA team are finishing cover the intelligence commands feature with selenium tests. For us very important - our test plan meet acceptance criteria for intelligence commands. Is there sufficient coverage of functionality of this one? Please take a look on this document: https://github.com/codenvy/qa/wiki/Test-plan-of-intelligence-commands-feature |
Ok thanks. I have reviewed the issues and closed few that are not bugs. About the test plan:
|
In this document describe short user story implemented in the selenium tests: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDEEWmxOu53omnkxnG8n3eyii-79utk5qeEZscTeGWg/edit?userstoinvite=ashmaraev@codenvy.com&ts=58db655a |
Please review the tests for factories may be one of them cover workflow with I.C. If we do not have some usecases, please, provide this one for us. We do this |
This doc is covering usual factories flows. It is not covering how the new commands are handled in factories. You should have those user stories related to Intelligent Commands:
|
Ok, i will try add this one in the autotests. On this moment we will do this in manual mode. |
In future, we should reserve epics for end user stories and not really use them as just a collection of like-minded bugs. It was really impressive how much we did here, though. |
In the developing we have new command widget . Actual bugs :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: