Support for "FUNCTION ALL INTRINSIC" #2060
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
|
The parser is currently being redesigned. |
|
also reported in CCF - BroadcomMFD/cobol-control-flow#57 |
This was referenced Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
In the REPOSITORY paragraph, the word "ALL" in "FUNCTION ALL INTRINSIC" is flagged as an error.
It would be nice if it didn't flag is as an error and it would also be nice if it also took it into account when parsing the rest of the code so you don't get errors when writing intrinsic functions without the "FUNCTION" keyword before.
Steps to reproduce
Add:
Under the "CONFIGURATION SECTION.
Expected behavior
It should not be flagged as an error and the parser should take it into account and not require the "FUNCTION" keyword before intrinsic functions.
Screenshots
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: